• Where do you start: technology or organizational change?

    I come across companies who think they need to improve their technology (and most often do) but discount the fact that no matter how good the technology they buy, it won't do much good until they change their organization - 'upgrade' their culture/processes/structure/skills/etc.
    On the other hand, I see some who use technology to drive the organizational changes.
    How do you approach this internally, externally, and with client/vendor settings?

    Answer Follow Share

  • Answers (7)

  • Mark Fleming

    26/11/2018 10:13AM

    Hi Katalin, as others have said, this is a big question. Great wisdom and advice in the responses so far. I've worked with multiple businesses who've had to answer this question for themselves and seen various approaches. Some observations:
    - Start with your business process, not with technology, but be generally aware of the relevant technology. No point working to design a new business process that assumes the availability of enabling technology that isn't (yet) available.
    - Some businesses do have to start with a tactical technology investment, eg to be able to properly understand and analyse their spend.
    - Be aware of the "hard landscape" eg emerging regulations with which you'll need to comply, or changes in your supply chain that you'll need or want to embrace, eg introduction of blockchain
    - Do factor in the DNA of your business: do you have a good track record in selecting best of breed apps and connecting them together to enable your business processes, or are your most successful working with a single vendor / suite approach.

    Vote Report

    4

    Katalin Brennan Thank you for your response Mark. Indeed, business process is where most companies have to start... yet it makes a huge difference when they understand what technology can do for them... otherwise they'll end up replicating an old process in a new software that defeats the purpose. The reason I posed the question broadly is to gather responses like yours.

    26/11/2018 01:30PM

  • Marisol Buchanan

    04/12/2018 01:53AM

    You all have nailed it on the head! As a certified change master focusing on procurement, technology is the proverbial bow on the package. Define your goals and metrics, build processes and governance rules, build your teams to execute the plan and then provide the "tools" to make them efficient and strategic. I understand that there are issues with sunsetting software, in house made data bases and poorly implemented software that is adding to inefficiencies but, if you address the strategy first, maximize your most important assets (PEOPLE) then, the rest will follow suit.

    Vote Report

    2

    Katalin Brennan Thank you Marisol! Taking stock of your greatest assets, your people!!!, is often a forgotten activity. So many companies assume (an you know what that means) that they just assign people to take on things without looking at their the fit of best skills/attributes/interest/etc.

    04/12/2018 02:10AM

    Marisol Buchanan Katalin Brennan: Yes, and so many people are willing to work through the corporate changes when they feel that they are a part of that change... Create change agents! And a lot of talent is excited and willing to learn new processes/technology because it becomes just another attribute to add to their c.v. Selling them short is huge waste of time and money for all organizations, no matter the industry or size.

    04/12/2018 02:31AM

  • Abhi Dahiya

    24/11/2018 04:22PM

    Hi Katalin - The intent to change the organizational structure always has an underlying behavior aspect to it. Most organizations want to introduce in a culture of new behavior that should make it simple for the workforce to hop on the technology bandwagon. Author and Futurist Jacob Morgan wrote in one of this articles - "The real answer is somewhere in the middle--in order to truly be successful and adopt lasting change and efficiency, organizations need to focus on changing behavior and technology at the same time. You may want to change your employees' behavior so they collaborate more, but if you don't have the tools in place for them to actually collaborate, you can't drive that behavior. On the flip side, just giving your employees collaboration tools and software without any instruction or guidance won't be successful either."

    Vote Report

    2

    Katalin Brennan Very true Abhi! and this is precisely why I posed the question. IMHO, the organizations that need the most behavioral change are the least likely to recognize such need let a lone being able to find a solution/way to change. The two approaches I've seen work for these companies are the introduction of 'new blood' leadership and/or new technology.

    26/11/2018 01:37PM

  • Chris Cliffe FCIPS MIoD

    22/11/2018 06:08PM

    Huge question. Everyone in the UK public sector is 'digitally transforming' right now. The test for me is whether the IT function is leading, or whether the business is leading the change. Technology must be an enabler, not the reason for change. The two are so intertwined that this is often a difficult differentiation, but IT is not there to serve IT, it is there to enable the business to deliver. In that sense, procurement and IT are very similar, neither function can exist without a business reason - so focus on that, not tech.

    Vote Report

    2

    Katalin Brennan Thanks for responding Chris! I am much in agreement with you. Tech should be an enabler for improved procurement. I purposefully asked the question a bit 'big' ... tried not to 'lead' for a specific answer ;-)

    22/11/2018 06:43PM

  • Christeen Jonathan Paul

    21/11/2018 06:46AM

    That's a good question Katalin Brennan. I have seen people using both methods; some changes organisational factors and others changes the technology that they are using. But I think it will be great to redress and streamline business processes first and then to choose suitable technologies in-order to properly assist those business processes. We should first deal with internal settings.

    Vote Report

    2

    Katalin Brennan Much in agreement Christeen! Most of my conversations end up in examining the internal processes and their suitability for change.

    21/11/2018 02:10PM

    Christeen Jonathan Paul That's the right way !

    22/11/2018 06:46AM

  • Randall Smith

    26/11/2018 04:49AM

    Start with objectives, then business process, then organization, then technology in that order.

    Vote Report

    1

    Katalin Brennan Thank you for your input Randall. I think your order of steps works for most companies but not all. Objectives should always come first but the I have seen examples where the organization had to be next. When leadership personnel and/or org structure is the root cause for the ability to change/progress, you must start with this 'bottleneck'.

    26/11/2018 01:41PM

  • Brad Blonkvist

    28/11/2018 03:58PM

    Start with the organizational change in procurement. What do you want to be known for across the organization? What are better goals for you? What would you need to support those goals? Do you have the right resources and structure to achieve those goals? Changes are you may not. With your house in order or at least planned to be in order, then the selection of technology to meet specific needs can be addressed and yes the technology acquisition itself can drive significant changes across the organization if the toolsets are filling a previously agreed on need.

    Vote Report

    0

    Katalin Brennan Thank you for responding Brad! Your approach is certainly a good one. I think the most important thing is to get procurement examine themselves with questions you listed. Getting started is probably the hardest thing in change... it takes some open minded people, risk, and commitment... among other things.

    28/11/2018 04:15PM

Get involved in the discussion. To answer this question

Join now or Login